Permission to Appeal - January 2024
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
|
JCPC 2023/0098
Devendranath Hurnam (Appellant) v Attorney General and another (Respondents) (Mauritius) Neutral citation: 2023(SCJ- 430) |
Lord Reed, Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 31 January 2024 |
PTA is refused because there is no arguable point of law |
|
JCPC 2023/0099
Devendranath Hurnam (Appellant) v The State of Mauritius (Respondent) (Mauritius) Neutral citation: [2023 SCJ 13] |
Lord Reed, Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 31 January 2024 |
PTA is refused because the appeal is wholly devoid of merit. |
| In the following cases, the advice which the Board has given to His Majesty is as indicated below | |||
|
JCPC 2023/0100
Shirvon Stubbs (Appellant) v The King (Respondent) (Bahamas) Neutral citation: SCCrApp No. 272 of 2018 |
Lord Hodge Lord Sales Lady Simler |
Refused 31 January 2024 |
PTA is refused because there is not a risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred. |
|
JCPC 2023/0117
Bernard Jean Vincent Allet (Appellant) v Gambling Regulatory Authority (Respondent) (Mauritius) |
Lord Hodge Lord Sales Lady Simler |
Refused 31 January 2024 |
PTA is refused because there is no arguable point of law. |
|
JCPC 2023/0090
Chia Hsing Wang (Appellant) v Floreat Real Estate Ltd (Respondent) (British Virgin Islands) Neutral citation: |
Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lord Richards |
Refused 1 February 2024 |
PTA is refused because there is no arguable point of law on Ground and no arguable point of law on Grounds 1 or 3 which would if corrected have led to a different outcome. |
| JCPC 2023/0094 Gustavus Ferguson (Appellant) v Building Control Officer (Respondent) (The Bahamas) Neutral citation: SCCiv App. No. 36 of 2022 | Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lord Richards |
Refused 1 February 2024 |
PTA is Refused because there is no arguable point of law. |