
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
This is the final court of appeal for the UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies. It also serves those Commonwealth countries that have retained the appeal to His Majesty in Council or, in the case of republics, to the Judicial Committee.
The Court is open today from 9.00AM to 4.30PM
LISTINGS
Upcoming
- Forthwell Limited (Appellant) v Pontegadea UK Limited (Respondent)
UK Supreme Court
Judgment
17 September 2026
Lord Reed,
Lord Stephens,
Lady Simler,
Lord Doherty,
Lord Hodge
In what circumstances can a party to a contract recover damages for a breach of that contract in respect of losses that were sustained not by the contracting party itself but by its subsidiary?
- R (on the application of Quaye) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent)
UK Supreme Court
Judgment
22 September 2026
Lord Sales,
Lord Briggs,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Stephens,
Lady Simler
Is section 128 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022, which inserted sections 27A and 27B into the Crime (Sentences) Act 1997, compatible with articles 5, 7, and 14 (read with article 5), of the European Convention on Human Rights?
- The Czech Republic (Appellant) v Diag Human SE and another (Respondents) No 2
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
23 November 2026
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Leggatt,
Lord Burrows,
Lord Doherty
Does “control” for the purposes of Article 1(1)(c) of the investment treaty agreed between the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic and the Swiss Confederation dated 5 October 1990 (“BIT”) require that the legal entity be controlled de jure, or is de facto control sufficient? What is the test for “de facto” control for the purposes of Article 1(1)(c) BIT? Did the CA err by holding that CR’s objection to Mr Strava’s claim in respect of breaches of the BIT post-dating the alleged disposal of his interest in the qualifying investments was not an objection to “substantive jurisdiction” under section 30 Arbitration Act 1996? Did the Court of Appeal err by ordering that the full BIT award should be paid to Mr Stava despite finding that Diag Human SE was not a qualifying investor for the purposes of the BIT?
Linked cases
- The Czech Republic (Respondent) v Diag Human SE and another (Appellants)
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
23 November 2026
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Leggatt,
Lord Burrows,
Lord Doherty
Does “control” for the purposes of Article 1(1)(c) of the investment treaty agreed between the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic and the Swiss Confederation dated 5 October 1990 (“BIT”) require that the legal entity be controlled de jure, or is de facto control sufficient? What is the test for “de facto” control for the purposes of Article 1(1)(c) BIT? Did the CA err by holding that CR’s objection to Mr Strava’s claim in respect of breaches of the BIT post-dating the alleged disposal of his interest in the qualifying investments was not an objection to “substantive jurisdiction” under section 30 Arbitration Act 1996? Did the Court of Appeal err by ordering that the full BIT award should be paid to Mr Stava despite finding that Diag Human SE was not a qualifying investor for the purposes of the BIT?
Linked cases
- Risk Reduction International Ltd (Appellant) v Absa Bank (Mauritius) Ltd (Respondent) (Mauritius)
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Hearing
1 December 2026
Lord Briggs,
Lord Burrows,
Lady Rose,
Lord Doherty,
Lord Snowden
Did the courts below err in finding that the Appellant unreasonably failed to mitigate its loss? If the courts below were correct to find that the defendant unreasonably failed to mitigate its loss, did that failure arise: (1) on 31 January 2012, when the Appellant instructed the Respondent to reconvert the money in its account from US dollars into South African Rands (as the Commercial Division found), or (2) on 1 March 2012, owing to the Appellant’s failure to direct that the money in its account be converted into US dollars (as the Court of Civil Appeal found)?
THINGS TO DO

Take a tour of the Court
We offer a range of tours to suit individuals and groups, including in-person and virtual tours.
Exhibitions and events
Find out what's on, including our permanent exhibition about the history and work of the Court.
NEWS

Latest judgments
•
16 September 2026
Latest Judgment
Latest Judgment

Future judgments
•
15 September 2026
Future Judgments
Future Judgments

Other
•
10 September 2026
Gratis visa application process for parties attending the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London announced
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) is pleased to confirm a free streamlined process for visa applications by parties attending appeals in London.
SPEECHES
LATEST JUDGMENTS
16 September 2026
Francis (Appellant) v Attorney General of St Helena for and on behalf of the Crown (Respondent) (St Helena)28 August 2026
Aeden Balwah (by Shelly-Ann Balwah, his Mother and Next Friend) and another (Respondents) v Marwan Ahmad Alsayed Abdulla (Appellant) (Trinidad & Tobago)- Aeden Balwah (by Shelly-Ann Balwah, his Mother and Next Friend) (Appellant) v Surgi-Med Clinic Co Limited and another (Respondents) No 2 (Trinidad & Tobago)
- Aeden Balwah (by Shelly-Ann Balwah, his Mother and Next Friend) (Respondent) v Surgi-Med Clinic Co Limited (Appellant) (Trinidad and Tobago)
20 August 2026
Paradise Island Lighthouse and Beach Club Company Limited (Appellant) v The Attorney General of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas (Respondent) (Bahamas)



