Visit UKSCAll cases
946 Cases
JCPC/2025/0122
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal: 1) Err in its approach to reviewing findings of fact? 2) Misapply the law on adverse possession? 3) Fail to apply the proper evidential standard and draw the necessary inferences for allegations of fraud? 4) Fail to scrutinise the exercise of discretion? 5) Err in refusing to permit Counsel to withdraw or in refusing an adjournment?
Last updated: 6 May 2026
JCPC/2024/0085
•
TORT
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Whether the Court of Appeal erred by: (1) Holding the Appellants do not have a statutory right of appeal to the Privy Council. (2) Ruling that Mrs Bethel was unlawfully detained between 1 am and 3 pm on Saturday 13 December 2014; (3) Ruling that the State (or some of the appellants) are vicariously liable for the acts of Mr Bastian.
Last updated: 6 May 2026
JCPC/2021/0069
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Judgment givenCase summary:A landowner has the right to recover possession of his land if it is occupied without his authorisation by another person, including a former tenant. The landowner must bring his claim within sixteen years.The issues in this appeal are (1) whether the sixteen year period begins to run from the date on which rent was last paid, and, if so, (2) when rent was last paid in respect of the land with which this case is concerned.
Last updated: 5 May 2026
JCPC/2022/0023
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment givenCase summary:Whether the Supreme Court of Mauritius were correct to overturn the Industrial Court's decision that the Appellant had not wrongly and unjustifiably terminated the Respondent's employment.
Last updated: 5 May 2026
JCPC/2020/0078
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:Whether the relevant contract was one between a principal and agent or a contract of sale and resale? If the contract was between a principal and agent, did the agent exceed its authority when it entered into various agreements to sell certain land? If the agent did exceed its authority, were the agent's actions ratified by the principals?
Last updated: 5 May 2026
JCPC/2022/0084
•
PUBLIC LAW/HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Appellant's constitutional right to freedom of expression contravened? If there was an unconstitutional contravention of the Appellant's right to freedom of expression, what remedies is he entitled to?
Last updated: 5 May 2026
JCPC/2023/0010
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment givenCase summary:Whether the Court of Appeal erred in revising downwards the quantum of damages awarded to the Appellant for the unlawful termination of his employment.
Last updated: 1 May 2026
JCPC/2023/0031
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:Whether the High Court erred granting the Respondent summary judgment against the Appellant and refusing to grant the Appellant specific disclosure.
Last updated: 1 May 2026
JCPC/2025/0029
•
EMPLOYMENT
Awaiting judgmentCase summary:Does the definition of “Annual Basic Salary” in the employment contract between the Appellant and the Respondent (and the annex to that contract) violate the End of the Year Gratuity Act 2001 (“EYGA”)?
Last updated: 1 May 2026
JCPC/2025/0021
•
COMMERCIAL
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in holding that certain payments from EHL to EIC should be credited against the liability of Mr Flowers to pay equitable compensation for dishonest breaches of fiduciary duty and/or damages for breaches of common law?
Linked casesLast updated: 30 April 2026
JCPC/2025/0020
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in ruling that neither clause 11.4 nor the common law relating to public policy meant that the Icebreaker policies were void or unenforceable or otherwise provided EIC with a defence to the claims by policyholders?
Linked casesLast updated: 30 April 2026
JCPC/2023/0007
•
CONSTITUTIONS
Judgment givenCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in: - failing to apply the established case law and principles in relation to the Respondent's challenge of the DPP's decision to continue the prosecution and/or in relation to whether the criminal trial judge had sufficient and appropriate tools to deal with the Respondents' complaints; - concluding that the DPP's decision to allow the criminal trial process to deal with the Respondent's complaints was so exceptional as to be reviewable on the grounds of irrationality and/or abuse of process; - concluding that it was unnecessary to the High Court's reasoning to make a finding that the DPP's sole eyewitness had committed perjury; and - concluding that the High Court was correct to have granted leave for judicial review.
Last updated: 30 April 2026
JCPC/2026/0034
•
Appeal issuedCase summary:Last updated: 29 April 2026
JCPC/2023/0087
•
CONSTITUTION
Hearing listedCase summary:Is the Appellant’s claim against a magistrate under section 6 of the Public Officers’ Protection Act 1957 barred by a principle of judicial immunity and/or the Mauritian Civil Code of Procedure?
Last updated: 29 April 2026
JCPC/2023/0067
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment givenCase summary:(i) Was the Court of Appeal wrong because it did not overturn the decision of the trial judge to strike out Mr Hosein’s constitutional claim on the basis of various factors, in particular the availability of a parallel remedy and the delay in bringing proceedings? (ii) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to conclude there was no evidence of apparent bias on the part of the trial judge?
Last updated: 29 April 2026
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.