Visit UKSCJCPC/2024/0031
•
NEGLIGENCE
Rubis Bahamas Ltd (Appellant) v Lillian Antionette Russell (Respondent) (The Bahamas)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2024/0031
Jurisdiction
Bahamas
Parties
Appellant(s)
Rubis Bahamas Ltd
Respondent(s)
Lillian Antionette Russell
Issue
(1) Can claims for unliquidated damages exceeding $4,000 give rise to appeals to the JCPC as of right under section 23(1) of the Bahamas Court of Appeal Act (the “CA Act”)? (2) Does the rule in Rylands v Fletcher impose strict liability on a landowner and lessor who neither occupies the land, nor owns or controls the dangerous thing? (3) Is the storage of fuel underground a “non-natural use of land” for the purposes of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher?
Facts
In approximately 2012/13, a leak occurred from underground fuel tanks at a service station in Nassau (the “2012/13 Leak”). The service station was owned by the appellant, Rubis, but had been leased to a third party called Fiorente Management and Investment Limited (“Fiorente”). The respondent, Ms Russell, lived on a property adjacent to the service station at the time of the 2012/13 Leak. In 2015, Ms Russell brought a claim against Rubis alleging that the 2012/13 Leak, together with another leak that had occurred in 1994 (the “1994 Leak”), had caused damage to her property. Ms Russell claimed against Rubis for negligence, trespass and nuisance in respect of both the 1994 and 2012/13 Leaks. Ms Russell also claimed that Rubis was liable for the 2012/13 Leak under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher, which provides that a person may be held strictly liable for bringing or keeping on their land something dangerous that escapes and causes damage to a neighbour’s property. The Bahamas Supreme Court held that Rubis was liable to Ms Russell in respect of both the 2012/13 and 1994 Leaks. The Bahamas Court of Appeal partially allowed Rubis’s subsequent appeal. It found that Rubis was not liable for damage caused by the 1994 Leak, but was liable for the 2012/13 Leak, including pursuant to the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (the “Substantive Judgment”). In February 2024, the Bahamas Court of Appeal dismissed Rubis’s application to appeal the Substantive Judgment to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (the “PTA Judgment”). Rubis now seeks leave to appeal from the Judicial Committee itself. This is a hearing of the preliminary issue whether this is an appeal as of right.
Date of issue
22 April 2024
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
27 January 2025
End date
27 January 2025
Watch hearings
27 January 2025 - Morning session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 20 December 2024