JCPC/2023/0046
•
EMPLOYMENT
Mitoonlal Persad and another (Appellants) v Registration, Recognition and Certification Board (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2023/0046
Jurisdiction
Trinidad and Tobago
Parties
Appellant(s)
(1) Mr Mitoonlal Persad, (2) Sanctuary Workers Trade Union
Respondent(s)
Registration, Recognition and Certification Board
Issue
Was the Court of Appeal wrong to find that: (i) the jurisdiction of the High Court to determine the issue in this appeal was ousted by s.23(6) and (7) of the Industrial Relations Act; and (ii) the Registration, Recognition and Certification Board (the "Board") did not act in breach of natural justice, nor did it fetter its discretion when making its decision in relation to good standing?
Facts
The First Appellant, Mr Persad, was dismissed from his employment with Royal Bank of Canada Limited ("RBC"). Mr Persad, who was a fully paid-up member of the Sanctury Workers' Trade Union (the "Union", the Second Appellant in these proceedings), wished to challenge his dismissal. Through his membership of, and with the support of, the Union, Mr Persad would ordinarily have been entitled to make a claim to the Industrial Court challenging RBC's decision to dismiss him. However, in order for a union to be able to appear before the Industrial Court, it must be recognised by the Board (the Respondent in these proceedings). A union will not be recognised by the Board unless it is in good standing. The Board considered the position of the Union and found it was in breach of s.34(3) of the Industrial Relations Act (the "IRA") because it had not opened a bank account. The Board said this meant the Union had not followed sound accounting procedures and practices, as required under s.34(3). The Appellants issued a claim for judicial review, arguing that the findings made by the Union were unlawful for a number of reasons, including that there is no definition of 'sound accounting procedures and practices' in the IRA. The High Court considered it had jurisdiction to hear the claim, and found that the Board's decision that Mr Persad was not a member of standing of the Union was unlawful. The High Court also concluded that the decision the Board had made, based on its policy, was disproportionate and procedurally unfair. The Court of Appeal overturned the decision, finding, amongst other things, that the High Court did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. The Appellants now appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
Date of issue
12 June 2023
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
4 November 2024
End date
4 November 2024
Watch hearings
4 November 2024 - Morning session
4 November 2024 - Afternoon session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 4 November 2024