Visit UKSCJCPC/2022/0074
•
COMMERCIAL
Mauritius Telecom Ltd and 3 others (Respondents) v Emtel Ltd (Appellant) No 2 (Mauritius)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2022/0074
Jurisdiction
Mauritius
Parties
Appellant(s)
Emtel Ltd
Respondent(s)
(1) The Information and Communication Technologies Authority
(2) Mauritius Telecom Ltd, Cellplus Mobile Communications Ltd
(3) The Ministry of Information Technology, Communication and Innovation
Issue
Whether Mauritius Telecom and Cellplus are liable for acts of alleged unfair competition for breaches of (i) the conditions of Cellplus' mobile phone services licence for operations in Mauritius and (ii) conducting a mobile phone services business prior to the issue of this licence.Whether the Information and Communication Technologies Authority is jointly liable for tolerating these breaches or whether it cannot be held liable in tort as it has no distinct legal personality.
Facts
In 1989, the Mauritius Telecommunication Authority granted an exclusive licence to Emtel for a seven-year term to provide mobile phone services in Mauritius.For the operation of the mobile network, Emtel needed to be connected to Mauritius's fixed telephone lines which were operated, during the relevant period, by Mauritius Telecom, a state-owned entity.In March 1996, Mauritius Telecom incorporated a subsidiary, Cellplus, to operate a mobile phone service competing with Emtel and in September 1996 the Telecommunications Authority granted Cellplus a mobile phone licence on two conditions: (i) Mauritius Telecom had to offer the same interconnection terms (i.e. to the fixed line network) to Emtel as it offered Cellplus; and (ii) Mauritius Telecom was prevented from cross-subsidising Cellplus from profits generated from its monopoly fixed line service.In June 2000, Emtel claimed damages against (i) the successor of the Telecommunications Authority (the Information and Communication Technologies Authority) (ii) Mauritius Telecom, (iii) Cellplus and (iv) the Ministry of Telecommunications, for acts of unfair competition contrary to Articles 1382 and 1383 of the Mauritian Civil Code.Emtel alleged: (i) Cellplus provided unlicensed mobile phone services for a six-month period from March 1996 (when it was incorporated) until September 1996 (when it was granted a licence); and (ii) Cellplus had breached the conditions of its licence.At first instance, the court held that both Mauritius Telecom and Cellplus had breached Article 1382 and the Information Communication Technologies Authority was also liable for tolerating these breaches (although the Ministry was not liable). It awarded damages to Emtel on this basis. The Court of Appeal overturned this decision on appeal.
Date of issue
29 August 2022
Linked cases
Legal issue
Judgment details
Judgment date
22 April 2024
Neutral citation
[2024] UKPC 9
Judgment links
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Full hearing
Start date
16 January 2024
End date
17 January 2024
Watch hearings
16 January 2024 - Morning session
16 January 2024 - Afternoon session
17 January 2024 - Morning session
17 January 2024 - Afternoon session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 9 May 2024