Zachary De Silva (Appellant) v Licensing Authority of Trinidad & Tobago and another (Respondents) (Trinidad and Tobago)

Case summary

Case ID

JCPC/2022/0050

Jurisdiction

Trinidad and Tobago

Parties

Appellant(s)

Zachary Da Silva

Respondent(s)

(1) Licensing Authority of Trinidad & Tobago (2) The Transport Commissioner

Issue

Whether the Court of Appeal erred in determining that it is the Court of Appeal, and not the High Court, that is proper forum for appeals under section 88M of the Motor Vehicles and Road Traffic Act Ch 48:50 ("the MRTA"), from a decision to disqualify a person from holding or obtaining a driving permit.

Facts

The Appellant was disqualified from holding or obtaining a driving permit for six months because he had accumulated 10 demerit points (penalty points) within a period of three years. The Appellant sought to appeal the decision of the Licensing Authority of Trinidad and Tobago and/or the Transport Commissioner (the Respondents) to the High Court.The High Court dismissed the Appellant's appeal on the basis that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal. The High Court ruled that under section 88M(9) MRTA such appeals must be made to the Court of Appeal, being the "Court of competent jurisdiction". The demerit point system and section 88M MRTA had been introduced, along with other matters, by the Motor Vehicles and Road Traffic (Amendment Act) 2017 ("the 2017 Amendment Act"). The appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal in relation to traffic offences existed from the inception of the MRTA, this had not been changed by amendments brought in by the 2017 Amendment Act.The Court of Appeal dismissed the Appellant's appeal. The Court of Appeal considered that Parliament would not have changed the appeals system, without expressly saying so. Further, appeals regarding traffic ticket matters in the Magistrate court (where the penalties that can be imposed by the Magistrate are the same as that which the Authority may impose) proceed directly to the Court of Appeal. A bifurcated process had the potential to create confusion and inconsistent decision making by the Court of Appeal and the High Court.

Date of issue

16 May 2022

Judgment details

Judgment date

25 June 2024

Neutral citation

[2024] UKPC 17

Judgment links

Appeal

Justices

Lord Reed

Lord Sales

Lord Hamblen

Lord Leggatt

Lady Rose

Hearing dates

Start date

20 March 2024

End date

20 March 2024

Watch hearings

Back to top