Permission to Appeal - May and June 2022

Permission to Appeal - May and June 2022

You may need to turn your phones when viewing table on mobile phone

Case NameJusticesPTAReasons given
Pravesh Kumar Boulet (Appellant) vIndependent Committee Against Corruption and another (Respondents) (Mauritius)
JCPC 2021/0052
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
25 May 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case.
Clifford Cursley Vivien (Appellant) vThe State of Mauritius (Respondent) (Mauritius)
JCPC 2021/0076
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
25 May 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case.
In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below
Edward Gittins and another (Appellants) vMontpelier (Trust and Corporate) Services Ltd (in Liquidation) (acting through Gordon Wilson as Receiver and Manager) (Respondent) (Isle of Man)
JCPC 2021/0067
Neutral Citation Number 2DS 2020/11
Lord Hodge
Lord Hamblen
Lady Rose
Refused
8 June 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
Dion Bethel (Appellant) vThe Queen (Respondent) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2021/0102
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Leggatt
Refused
8 June 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. There was no arguable error of law.
The Queen (Respondent) vDurad Munroe (Appellant) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2018/0092
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Leggatt
Refused
8 June 2022
Permission to appeal be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. The new constitutional points are not arguable, were not raised below and are not appropriate to be determined by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
Robert Joseph Slack and another (Appellants) vSails Management Ltd (Respondent) (Gibraltar)
JCPC 2021/0108
Neutral Citation Number 2021/GCA/08
Lord Briggs
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows
Refused
8 June 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
Peter John Nygard (Appellant) vFrederick Smith QC and 2 others (Respondents) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2021/0089
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Stephens
Refused
8 June 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law.
Nordbuild Ltd and another (Appellants) vAttorney General of Jamaica and 8 others (Respondents) (Jamaica)
JCPC 2021/0079
Neutral Citation Number [2021] JMCA Civ 14
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Stephens
Refused
8 June 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law.

Back to top