Permission to Appeal - March 2015
You may need to turn your phones when viewing table on mobile phone
Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
---|---|---|---|
Changou (Appellant) v The State of Mauritius (Respondent) (Mauritius) Case No: JCPC 2014/0113 | Lord Kerr Lord Carnwath Lord Hodge | Refused May 2015 | Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law, or a point of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Judicial Committee at this time and there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred. |
In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below | |||
Morrison (Appellant) v The Queen (Respondent) (Jamaica) Case No: JCPC 2014/0075 | Lord Kerr Lord Clarke Lord Hughes | Refused 19 March 2015 | Permission to appeal against conviction should be refused. The application relating to sentence should be treated as the hearing of the appeal, and the appeal in respect of sentence should be allowed to the extent of ordering the sentence imposed to commence on 12th October 2005, rather than any other date. |
Penn (Appellant) v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) (British Virgin Islands) Case No: JCPC 2015/0001 | Lord Neuberger Lord Clarke Lord Hughes | Refused May 2015 | Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law and there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred. |
Gubay (Appellant) v Willers (Respondent) (Isle of Man) Case No: JCPC 2015/0021 | Lord Neuberger Lord Clarke Lord Hughes | Refused May 2015 | Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
Commonwealth Union of Hotel Services & Allied Workers (Appellant) v Huchinson Lucaya Limited t/a Grand Lucaya Bahamas (Respondent) (Bahamas) Case No: JCPC 2014/0105 | Lady Hale Lord Wilson Lord Reed | Refused May 2015 | Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
Wright (Appellant) v The Queen (Respondent) (Cayman Islands) Case No: JCPC 2014/0112 | Lord Mance Lord Sumption Lord Toulson | Granted May 2015 | |
Creser (Appellant) v Creser and another (Respondents) (New Zealand) Case No: JCPC 2014/0096 | Lord Kerr Lord Carnwath Lord Hodge | Refused May 2015 | Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Judicial Committee at this time and the application is greatly out of time. |