Permission to Appeal - February 2024
Permission to Appeal - February 2024
You may need to turn your phones when viewing table on mobile phone
Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
---|---|---|---|
JCPC 2023/0108 Chabelal Khimraj (Appellant) v Rajkumar Ramadhar (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago) Neutral citation: CA S093/2021 | Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens | Refused 29 February 2024 | Permission to Appeal is refused because there is no point of law of general public importance and no arguable point of law. |
In the following cases, the advice which the Board has given to His Majesty is as indicated below | |||
JCPC 2023/0111 CRGF GP Ltd (Respondent) v Fonds Rusnano Capital SA (Appellant) (Guernsey) Neutral citation: Appeal No. 563 | Lord Hodge Lord Leggatt Lord Richards | Refused 4 March 2024 | Permission to Appeal is refused because there is no arguable point of law. |
JCPC 2023/0101 Darius Williams (Appellant) v The King (Respondent) (Bahamas) Neutral citation: SCCCrApp. No. 30 of 2020 | Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens | Refused 29 February 2024 | Permission to Appeal is refused because there is no risk of serious miscarriage of justice. |
JCPC 2023/0113 Jerome Dixon (Appellant) v The King (Respondent) Neutral citation: [2022] JMCA Crim 2 | Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens | Refused 29 February 2024 | Permission to Appeal is refused because there is no risk of serious miscarriage of justice. |
JCPC 2023/0093 Kayoy Jarrett (Appellant) v The King (Respondent) (Montserrat) Neutral citation: MNIHCRAP2022/0006 | Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens | Refused 29 February 2024 | Permission to Appeal is refused because there is no risk of serious miscarriage of justice. |