Permission to Appeal - April 2022

You may need to turn your phone when viewing table on mobile phone

Case Name	Justices	PTA	Reasons given
Chandra Silochan and another (Appellants) v Rickie Cedeno (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago) JCPC 2022/0002 Neutral Citation Number POSMG Appeal No P092 of 2019	Lord Kitchin Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows	Granted 1 April 2022	N/A
Marlon King (Appellant) v The State of Trinidad and Tobago (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago) JCPC 2021/0096	Lord Kitchin Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows	Refused 8 April 2022	Permission to appeal is refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law; no issue of public importance arises; and there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case.
LC Regis Samy and others (Appellants) v Winsley Dauguet and 3 others (Respondents) (Mauritius) JCPC 2021/0017	Lord Hodge Lord Leggatt Lady Rose	Refused 11 April 2022	Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below
St. Kitts Nevis Anguilla National Bank Ltd (Respondent) v Pinneys Hotel Development Ltd (Appellant) (St Christopher and Nevis) JCPC 2021/0049	Lord Hodge Lord Leggatt Lady Rose	Refused 13 April 2022	Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
Phoenix Group Foundation and another (Appellants) v Carl Jackson and 3 others (Respondents) (British Virgin Islands) JCPC 2021/0039	Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lady Rose	Refused 13 April 2022	Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no appeal as of right and the appeal does not raise a point of law of general public importance.
Julie McIntosh (Appellant) v Family Guardian Insurance Company Ltd (Respondent) (Bahamas) JCPC 2021/0040	Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lady Rose	Refused 13 April 2022	Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. The appeal is wholly lacking merit.
Alistair McDonald (Appellant) v The Queen (Respondent) (Jamaica) JCPC 2021/0025	Lord Kitchin Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows	Refused 13 April 2022	Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law; no issue of public importance arises; and there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case.