Visit UKSCUKSC/2025/0067
•
COMMERCIAL
Gatwick Investment Limited and others (Appellants) v Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE (Respondent)
Case summary
Case ID
UKSC/2025/0067
Parties
Appellant(s)
(1) Gatwick Investment Ltd (2) Millcroft Management Ltd (3) Sal Hotels Ltd (4) Serena Investments Ltd (5) Southampton Row Hotel LLP (6) London Victoria Hotel No 2 Ltd
Respondent(s)
Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE
Issue
Do 'furlough' payments paid by the UK Government under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (“CJRS”) to policyholders fall to be deducted from the amounts otherwise payable by insurers in claims for "business interruption" losses suffered because of the Covid-19 pandemic?
Facts
These appeals concern business interruption insurance claims arising out of the Covid-19 pandemic. Certain insurance policies provide explicit cover for losses resulting from interruption with the policyholder's business at their premises which arise in consequence of Government actions responding to certain insured perils. Covid-19 may be such an insured peril. The policies in these appeals contain "savings" clauses which provide for a deduction from the amount payable by the insurers if “any of the charges or expenses” of the policyholder “cease or reduce in consequence of the Damage” (or words to similar effect). These appeals concern the correct construction of such clauses. As part of the Government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, it established the CJRS. Under this scheme, employers who had “furloughed” their employees by instructing them to cease work could claim payments reimbursing the employers for their expenditure on the employees’ wages. Each of the appellants is a company which was insured under an insurance policy with the respondent insurers. The first appellants are six companies, each of which owns or operates a separate hotel in England. The second appellants are various insured companies within the Arena Racing group, who operate racecourses and greyhound racing tracks, among other things, in England and Wales. Each appellant successfully claimed payments under the CJRS after furloughing their employees by instructing them to cease work. The appellants claimed business interruption losses sustained during the Covid-19 pandemic under their insurance policies with the respondents. The respondents accept that they are in principle liable in accordance with the policies for such losses but argue that the payments received by the appellants under the CJRS should be deducted from the sum payable under the savings clauses in the insurance policies. In the High Court, Jacobs J found that credit should be given for the CJRS payments. The Court of Appeal agreed with that conclusion. The Appellants now appeal to the Supreme Court.
Date of issue
23 April 2025
Case origin
PTA
Written arguments
Statements of Facts and Issues
Linked cases
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Full hearing
Start date
11 February 2026
End date
12 February 2026
Watch hearings
11 February 2026 - Morning session
11 February 2026 - Afternoon session
12 February 2026 - Morning session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Permission to Appeal
Justices
Permission to Appeal decision date
1 July 2025
Permission to Appeal decision
Granted
Previous proceedings
Change log
Last updated 14 August 2025