Visit UKSCJCPC/2022/0018
•
CONSTITUTIONS
Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (Respondent) v JM (A minor by his kin and next Friend NM) (Appellant) (Trinidad and Tobago)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2022/0018
Jurisdiction
Trinidad and Tobago
Parties
Appellant(s)
JM (A minor by his kin and next Friend NM)
Respondent(s)
Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
Issue
Whether the Court of Appeal erred in law in: (i) setting aside the judge’s award of vindicatory damages; (ii) finding that JM had been lawfully detained at St Michael’s between September 2012 and June 2014; (iii) not awarding damages in respect of that detention; (iv) finding that JM had not been subjected to cruel and unusual treatment; (v) setting aside the judge’s assessment of the quantum of damages for JM’s detention at St Ann’s.
Facts
In this case a minor claims damages for breach of his constitutional rights while in the custody of the State. The appellant, JM, has Prader-Willi syndrome and was a minor during the events described below. Prader-Willi syndrome is a rare and complex genetic disorder that often produces difficult behavioural problems. In September 2012 JM, then 9 years old, was removed from his mother’s care and placed into State custody. JM’s mother, NM, had been arrested and charged with child abandonment and neglect and was later convicted.JM was placed at St Michael’s School for Boys where he remained for some years. JM’s care plan was not consistently implemented at St Michael’s, and he suffered from repeated bullying and abuse by other residents and staff. He nonetheless remained there until October 2016, when he was transferred to St Ann’s. Staff at St Ann’s struggled to manage JM’s challenging needs. In October 2017, after an application by NM, now acting as JM’s kin and next friend, JM was transferred to a Child Support Centre.JM, acting by NM, then issued a claim against the respondent, representing the State of Trinidad and Tobago. The claim sought a declaration that JM’s detention at St Michael’s and/or St Ann’s and the State’s failure to provide a licensed Community Residence breached his constitutional rights and freedoms, as well as monetary compensation, including vindicatory damages. The trial judge found in favour of JM and ordered that the State pay compensation, including vindicatory damages for the breach of JM’s constitutional rights. The respondent appealed. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part and substituted a new order for that made by the trial judge. JM now appeals to the JCPC.
Date of issue
21 February 2022
Judgment details
Judgment date
19 December 2022
Neutral citation
[2022] UKPC 54
Judgment links
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
13 October 2022
End date
13 October 2022
Watch hearings
13 October 2022 - Morning session
13 October 2022 - Afternoon session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 9 May 2024