Brandt (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police and others (Respondents) (Montserrat)

Case summary

Case ID

JCPC/2020/0079

Jurisdiction

Montserrat

Parties

Appellant(s)

David Brandt

Respondent(s)

Commissioner of Police

Attorney General

Director of Public Prosecutions

Issue

The principal issues before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council are as follows: 1. Was the search of the appellant’s mobile phones a breach of his constitutional rights, and if so, what if any remedy is he entitled to? 2. Was the appellant’s claim for constitutional relief an abuse of process, and can it be an abuse of process despite the finding of the High Court that it was not vexatious or frivolous?

Facts

In September 2015, the Montserrat police obtained from a magistrate a warrant to search premises occupied by Mr Brandt, who was suspected of having committed various offences under the Montserrat Penal Code. During the search, the police seized various mobile phones. The police subsequently searched the phones. They were found to contain potentially incriminating evidence. Mr Brandt was charged, in September 2016, with offences relating to the sexual exploitation of minors. He has not yet been tried.In May 2019, Mr Brandt filed a claim for constitutional relief seeking, among other things, a declaration that the evidence obtained as a result of searching his mobile phones is inadmissible in his trial. That claim was dismissed by the High Court as an abuse of process. The Court of Appeal upheld that ruling, but also held that the search of Mr Brandt’s mobile phones was unlawful, although not in breach of his constitutional rights. Mr Brandt now appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

Date of issue

14 October 2020

Judgment details

Judgment date

10 May 2021

Neutral citation

[2021] UKPC 12

Judgment links

Appeal

Justices

Lord Reed

Lord Lloyd-Jones

Lord Sales

Lord Hamblen

Lord Stephens

Hearing dates

Start date

23 March 2021

End date

23 March 2021

Watch hearings

Back to top