Visit UKSCJCPC/2020/0035
Energizer Supermarket Ltd (Appellant) v Holiday Snacks Ltd (Respondents) (Trinidad & Tobago)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2020/0035
Jurisdiction
Trinidad and Tobago
Parties
Appellant(s)
Energizer Supermarket Ltd
Respondent(s)
Holiday Snacks Ltd
Issue
What is the proper construction of the Trinidad and Tobago Petroleum Act and Regulations? Does the Act allow contractual rights to lay a gas pipe to be granted to parties who do not have a petroleum operations licence? Can property rights be validly granted over gas pipelines?
Facts
By a deed of conveyance made on 12 October 1993, Mr. Sookram Boodhai ("Boodhai") sold certain land to the Appellant, Energizer Supermarket Limited, for the purposes of building and operating a supermarket there. Boodhai is now deceased. By a prior agreement, made on 3 March 1986, Boodhai purported to grant a company called Kiss Baking Company Limited ("Kiss") a right to run a submerged gas pipeline over the same land in exchange for a one-off payment. Kiss constructed the gas pipeline on the land and the National Gas Company of Trinidad and Tobago supplies the gas. In April 1992, Kiss purported to assign its interests and obligations in the gas pipeline to its wholly owned subsidiary, the Respondent, Holiday Snacks Limited. The pipeline supplies natural gas to Holiday Snacks Limited and without the gas, Holiday Snacks might have to cease its operations. The Appellant found out about the gas pipeline in 1994, when a surveyor visited the site.The Appellant entered into negotiations with Kiss with a view to agreeing that Kiss would pay a certain amount to the Appellant in return for a right of way over the land to maintain the gas pipeline. The negotiations broke down in April 1996 and the Appellant sought the removal of the gas pipeline by Kiss. In 1997, the Appellant’s application for planning permission to build a supermarket on the land was refused because of the presence of the gas pipeline.The Respondent applied to the High Court for recognition that it had proprietary rights over the land in respect of the gas pipeline. The High Court allowed the claim, holding that the Respondent had a right of way over the land, which had been validly assigned to it by Kiss. The Court of Appeal dismissed the Appellant’s appeal.
Date of issue
23 March 2020
Judgment details
Judgment date
9 May 2022
Neutral citation
[2022] UKPC 16
Judgment links
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
15 March 2022
End date
15 March 2022
Watch hearings
15 March 2022 - Morning session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 9 May 2024