Visit UKSCJCPC/2019/0027
•
FAMILY
Ally Khan (Appellant) v Abdool (Respondent) (Mauritius) (No 2)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2019/0027
Jurisdiction
Mauritius
Parties
Appellant(s)
Ibrahim Rossanally Peer Allykhan
Respondent(s)
Nushrat Begum Abdool The Ministere Public The Registrar of Civil Status
Issue
Whether the courts below were correct to hold that Nushrat Begum Abdul (Nushrat) is the biological daughter of Abdullah Rossan Ally Peer Ally Khan (the Deceased).
Facts
Nushrat was born on 27 November 1990. Her biological mother (as separately determined by the Supreme Court of Mauritius in a decision not subsequently appealed) is Geeta Bundhoo.The Deceased died in 1999, not having acknowledged Nushrat as his daughter during his lifetime, save in a document executed before a Senior Attorney-at-Law and given to Nushrat.Mohammad Fahd Peer Ally Khan (Fahd) is the adopted son of the Deceased and brother to Ibrahim Rossanally Peer Ally Khan (Ibrahim), himself the acknowledged natural son of the Deceased and Beebee Affizah Ramjhan. Lootefiya Abdool is the daughter of the late Fazila Abdool, who, on the Deceased’s instructions, falsely declared at Nushrat’s birth that she was her mother.In 2001, an action en recherche de paternité pursuant to article 340 of the Mauritian Civil Code was commenced on Nushrat’s behalf against Ibrahim and Fahd. That action was ongoing when Nushrat turned 18 and she was substituted as Plaintiff in her own right.In February 2011, Counsel for Nushrat sought an order for DNA testing to ascertain if Nushrat and Ibrahim were related. The test result returned was that the chance of this was "very remote".Devat J however declined to consider that report and held in light of all the evidence that Nushrat was the natural daughter of the deceased. Specifically, in accordance with article 340, Devat J found that the Decased had participated in the maintenance, upkeep and education of Nushrat "en qualité de père". Devat J consequently directed the Registrar of Civil Status to amend Nushrat’s birth certificate, but declined to hold and decree that Nushrat, Fahd and Ibrahim were the sole heirs entitled to the Deceased’s estate.The Court of Appeal upheld the first-instance decision in each of the appeals brought independently by Fahd, Ibrahim, and Lootefiya Bibi Abdool, but heard together.
Date of issue
22 March 2019
Judgment details
Judgment date
23 July 2020
Judgment links
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
23 July 2020
End date
23 July 2020
Watch hearings
23 July 2020 - Morning session
23 July 2020 - Afternoon session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 9 May 2024