Visit UKSCJCPC/2018/0106
•
CRIME
Boodram (Respondent/Cross-appellant) v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (Appellant/Cross-respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2018/0106
Jurisdiction
Trinidad and Tobago
Parties
Appellant(s)
Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
Respondent(s)
Naresh Boodram
Issue
What is the nature of the exercise engaging the Court when it is asked to grant relief under section 14 of the Constitution in a case such as the present? In light of previous decisions of the Judicial Committee, including Pratt & Morgan, is it open to a Court exercising its power to grant relief under section 14 of the Constitution to substitute a sentence other than life imprisonment when commuting a death sentence? If it is, in what circumstances, and how, should the Court exercise the power to impose some other sentence? Subject to the above, would it be appropriate for a Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under section 14 of the Constitution, to substitute a sentence other than life imprisonment when commuting a death sentence in a case such as the present?
Facts
Mr Boodram was convicted of murder on 27 November 1996 and sentenced to death. In 2007, Mr Boodram commenced proceedings to have his death sentence quashed and to be resentenced by the High Court of Trinidad and Tobago. The High Court commuted his sentence to one of life imprisonment, considering that it did not have discretion to resentence him individually, and made no order as to costs. Mr Boodram appealed successfully to the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago, who found that the High Court was not constrained to impose a sentence of life imprisonment.The Court of Appeal remitted his case to the High Court to consider the appropriate sentence in the circumstances. The Court of Appeal made no order as to costs. The Attorney General is pursuing an appeal before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in relation to the nature and limits of the High Court’s discretion to resentence Mr Boodram. Mr Boodram cross-appeals in respect of the Court of Appeal’s decision that there should be no costs award in his favour.
Date of issue
7 December 2018
Judgment details
Judgment date
16 May 2022
Neutral citation
[2022] UKPC 20
Judgment links
Judgment summary
16 May 2022
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Full hearing
Start date
16 November 2021
End date
17 November 2021
Watch hearings
16 November 2021 - Morning session
16 November 2021 - Afternoon session
17 November 2021 - Morning session
17 November 2021 - Afternoon session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here.. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 9 May 2024