JCPC/2017/0067
•
CRIME
Kevin Stuart (Appellant) v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2017/0067
Jurisdiction
Trinidad and Tobago
Parties
Appellant(s)
Kevin Stuart (also known as Kevin Stewart)
Respondent(s)
Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
Issue
Did the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago err in overturning the trial Judge’s factual findings that there was a lack of honest belief and malice in the arrest and charge of the appellant?
Facts
The appellant was arrested at his home on 27 August 2011, taken to a police station and detained without charge until 29 August 2011. He was then charged with being a member of a gang. The Magistrates’ Court denied him bail and he was transferred first to a maximum-security prison, then to the Remand Yard Prison in Arouca. On 28 September 2011 the Director of Public Prosecutions discontinued proceedings against the appellant, and he was discharged the following day. The appellant issued proceedings in the High Court, claiming that he was arrested without reasonable or probable cause and that his prosecution was malicious. The High Court found in his favour and awarded him damages totalling $351,800 plus interest. The Court of Appeal then overturned the finding of malicious prosecution and reduced the damages to $50,000 plus interest. The appellant now appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on the ground that the Court of Appeal were wrong to find that the arrest and prosecution were not malicious.
Date of issue
18 September 2017
Judgment details
Judgment date
15 December 2022
Neutral citation
[2022] UKPC 53
Judgment links
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
15 November 2022
End date
15 November 2022
Watch hearings
15 November 2022 - Morning session
15 November 2022 - Afternoon session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 9 May 2024